![]() But they are still influenced by being qualified as either approaching or separating. There are two aspects - conjunction and opposition - that are neither waxing or waning. Well… this is not exactly true for all aspects. The nature of almost all aspects is influenced by them being qualified as waxing or waning. The correct answer would be: “ Certainly not! It depends on the dynamic nature of the aspect.” If we take, for example, a square aspect and ask ourselves: “ Do all squares behave the same way?” Are all squares equal?Įvery astrological chart expresses itself through the language of its aspects - conjunctions, squares, oppositions, trines, sextiles plus numerous minor aspects - that describe complex relationships between planetary forces. It’s the combinations of these two key observations that translates an astrological chart into a cohesive narrative. Another key is to see the aspects as stations within a larger planetary cycle. The key to understanding and interpreting an astrological chart often lies in the ability to interpret the aspects that planets make to each other. Waxing, waning, applying, separating aspects… sounds confusing? This multi-part story is aiming at demystifying these qualities of the astrological aspects and presenting a bigger picture of planetary cycles that makes for a deeper interpretation of an astrological chart.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |